Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
A lower court may not rule against a binding precedent, even though it feels that it can be unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. When the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the law evolve, it might possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of the cases; some jurisdictions allow to get a judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.
As the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is attained, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court could interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to really make it appropriate for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of your laws, the legal system adheres to your doctrine of stare decisis
During the United States, folks are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their own can remember a single rule of thumb when it read more comes to referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as possible, leading the court, not only for the case, but into the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
Should you find an error inside the material of the published opinion (like a misspelled name or perhaps a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
Only the written opinions of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals are routinely readily available. Decisions on the lessen (trial) courts are usually not generally published or dispersed.
Have you been looking for Court Information? You should use our site to search for just a case or search for any person. Information about the site is updated every 24 hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found on the search site is provided for use as reference material and isn't the official court record.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are definitely the opinions that are filed about the day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.
Any court may perhaps look for to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of this type of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.
refers to regulation that will come from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case law, also known as “common law,” and “case precedent,” gives a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, and how They may be applied in certain types of case.